Is Gender a Conditioning Factor in Family Medicine Practice? A Comparative Analysis within the OMFaM Sentinel Network.

Juan Jose Montero Alia, Mª Mercedes Jiménez González, Elena Zurilla Leonarte, Mªmar Rodríguez Alvarez, Lourdes Martín Montero, Felipe Saatdjan Maldonado, Maria Elena Pérez Contreras, Montserrat Rubio Villar, Anna Villabona Pedemonte, Esther Valentín Moya

Keywords: General Practitioners, Gender role, Workload

Introduction:

The feminization of family medicine raises questions about whether gender conditions different practice styles or leads to greater vulnerability to occupational stress. This study aims to compare real-world clinical activity (quantitative and qualitative) and emotional well-being between male and female physicians in a cohort of sentinel family doctors. Objective: Compare activity, resolution, relevance, and emotional state between male and female family doctors.

Method:

A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter, and serial study using convenience sampling. Participants: family physicians from primary care centers. Workloads were compared using clinical activity records—collected prospectively and in real-time to avoid recall bias—covering a full week in May 2025 in Catalonia (Spain). Variables: Visit volume, typology, resolution, adequacy, clinical relevance, and well-being: Resilience levels (CD-RISC10) and prevalence of Severe Burnout (MBI). Hypothesis testing (Student's t-test, Chi-square) was applied to determine significant differences.

Results:

55 physicians (13 men, 42 women). Mean age: 48.1 years (Men) vs. 50.2 years (Women) (p=0.48). Total visits analyzed: 7,692. Daily visit volume: 27.9 (M) vs. 30.6 (W) (p=0.14). Visit adequacy: 78.7% (M) vs. 78.8% (W) (p=0.93). Clinical relevance (0-4 scale): 1.75 (M) vs. 1.49 (W) (p<0.001). Resolution at first visit: 45.1% (M) vs. 43.1% (W) (p=0.09). Accumulated delay at the end of the shift: 19.2 min (M) vs. 25.0 min (W) (p=0.1). Severe Burnout: 15.4% (M) vs. 14.3% (W) (p=0.9). Mean resilience: 27.8 (M) vs. 29.4 (W) (p=0.44).

Conclusions:

There are no significant differences by gender in age, objective care pressure, visit adequacy, or burnout prevalence, showing a highly homogeneous practice profile. The only significant divergence is found in perceived clinical relevance, which is higher in men. This suggests a difference in the subjective self-assessment of daily clinical activity, without impacting technical resolution capacity or the observed emotional exhaustion levels.

#20

EQuiP Twitter Feed
EQuiP Facebook Feed